YatPundit's blog

Drupal 7!

Continuing the migration to Drupal 7, the "flagship site" is now upgraded... :-)

Po-Boy...

...a tune from One Mind Brass Band...

Is the Komen split with Planned Parenthood really about pink bibles?

There's an article this morning on NPR about the Komen for the Cure meltdown. The piece leads with Brinker's video response that says no, it's really not a political thing. But the meat is a few grafs down:

The latest controversy appears to have begun last month. An evangelical Christian group called Lifeway was selling pink bibles for Komen. But Lifeway discovered Komen was giving Planned Parenthood money.

"As soon as people figured out the link between Komen and Planned Parenthood — that there was a funding link there — Lifeway pulled all the bibles off the shelves immediately," said Amy Black, a political scientist at Wheaton College outside Chicago who studies evangelical Christians. "This was the kind of thing that captured a lot of activists' attention."

Lifeway is a big player in Christian publishing, with both online and physical presences (NOLA folks: there's a Lifeway store in the old Gentilly Woods Shopping Center, next to the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary). Ever look at what's for sale at a "Christian" bookstore? The quality of the merchandise is usually pretty horrid. A gimmick like pink bibles would mean a big boost in their sales. Given the political and religious connections Komen for the Cure has to right-wing politicians and businesses, this is no surprise.

So, Lifeway finds out Komen is hooked with Planned Parenthood and blows a gasket. Who will ever buy stuff from them again if they find out those pink bibles are killing babies?

Komen shows its kontempt as they join the forced-birth movement

Komen for the Cure decides to de-fund Planned Parenthood, showing the organizations extremist underbelly:

But three sources with direct knowledge of the Komen decision-making process told me that the rule was adopted in order to create an excuse to cut-off Planned Parenthood. (Komen gives out grants to roughly 2,000 organizations, and the new "no-investigations" rule applies to only one so far.) The decision to create a rule that would cut funding to Planned Parenthood, according to these sources, was driven by the organization's new senior vice-president for public policy, Karen Handel, a former gubernatorial candidate from Georgia who is staunchly anti-abortion and who has said that since she is "pro-life, I do not support the mission of Planned Parenthood." (The Komen grants to Planned Parenthood did not pay for abortion or contraception services, only cancer detection, according to all parties involved.) I've tried to reach Handel for comment, and will update this post if I speak with her.

This may well turn out to be a scorched-earth strategy for KFTC, but they're so well-entrenched, people will still wear pink in October like this never happened.

Unless we remind them.

You'll see a banner above. It's from the Komen website last night, when hactivists got to it:

I've taken the liberty of cropping out the hack itself and turned it into a banner for this site, with a link back to Planned Parenthood. Please consider supporting them so poor women can still get breast exams.

Battle of New Orleans Day

Illustration from an article in Harper's Weekly in 1861 about the Battle of New Orleans

I hesitate to say "happy Battle of New Orleans Day" because such loss of life is not cause to be happy. Still, it's good we remember the day and the impact the battle had on our history. Here are the two articles I did on the battle for GoNOLA.com. The first is about the run-up to the battle, the second on the events of 8-January-1815.

How bad social media cost @earthsavers a customer - a cautionary tale

That bag contains three gift certificates to Lovejoy Day Spa in Metairie, valued at $319.  They're part of Mrs. YatPundit's Christmas pressie this year. The story of how she came to be a Lovejoy customer is a cautionary tale for those of you in the social media business.

In the fall of 2010, I was followed on Twitter by @earthsavers, the business account for Earthsavers, a spa and store with three locations in metro New Orleans. I followed them back, but then started to get "DM spam" from them. I didn't appreciate these unsolicited messages going to my twitter account (and, by extension, to my phone via SMS). They're widely unpopular and regarded as "spamming" by a vast number of twitter regulars. I called out the company on their bad social media habits and unfollowed the account.

After doing this, @earthsavers' "social media consultant" proceeded to get into a public argument with me, which ended by her telling me that I wasn't in the company's target market.

Strictly speaking, however, that's true, but Mrs. YatPundit is very much in their target market. And I buy Mrs. YatPundit's presents for Christmas, birthday, Mother's Day, etc. Earthsavers has a whole section of their website dedicated to gift card sales, so clearly the company doesn't share their consultant's assessment of my worth to them.

Not being all that excited about spending my money with a company that was rude, I voted with my wallet, crowdsourcing an alternative. A twitter-bud suggested Lovejoy. It's in the same retail strip as a coffee shop I like, so I went over to check it out. Looked good, came recommended, so I bought wife one of those all-day packages for about $220.

She used the gift certificate to have her all-day facial/massage/mani/pedi/etc, and absolutely loved it. She enjoyed it, but I knew she'd never take more than one day a year to do the whole experience, so I went back earlier today and broke out what I spent into three gift certificates. Now she can go at different times of the year.

So, to sum up: I was chased off from a spa much closer to our house because of bad behavior by that company on social media. Taking my business elsewhere resulted in my wife becoming a very satisfied customer of the alternative spa. Now she'll be a repeat customer of the alternative.

The bottom line here is simple and obvious. Don't be a dick on social media. If it's part of your personality to be argumentative and/or confrontational, don't argue with customes or potential customers. It will cost you in the long run.

FAMU Band Story Just Doesn't Add Up

NPR did a story this morning on Morning Edition about the continued fallout from the death of a Florida A&M University (FAMU) Band drum major, Robert Champion. It's being described as a "hazing scandal" and the cops have ruled the death a homicide resulting from a beating:

Champion was a previously healthy 26-year-old who collapsed and died within an hour of the hazing incident, during which he suffered multiple blows to his body so severe that he bled out into his soft tissue, according to the summary. There were no signs of drugs or alcohol in his body.

OK, someone getting beaten to death, that happens. But "hazing?" I'm struggling with that part.

For openers, Mr. Champion was the Drum Major, one of the leaders of the band. Since when do underclassmen jump the drum major, beating him to death? Leaders of a fraternity (which is essentially what this band is) do the hazing; they don't die from it.

The second thing that makes me scratch my head is that Robert Champion was 26 years of age when he died. He's 26 and still in school? I was five years out of uni at 26. I'll concede that non-traditional students do start later, and often take longer, but that leads to the next point. Non-traditional students usually don't play the college game the same way their 18- and 19-year old classmates do.

I hope the cops don't look at this as simply an institutional issue. It doesn't help that FL-Gov Ric Scott is putting his nose in the situation. That piece of filth is most likely looking for any way he can to suppress black folks and their influence in the state.

Git yaself some cultcha this weekend at @NOMA1910...for FREE!

Ya know, y'all don't get out to Da Awt Museum often enough, and the New Orleans Museum of Art (NOMA) is giving you the perfect opportunity this weekend. NOMA celebrates their centennial birthday, marking the opening of the Delgado Museum, on December 16, 1911. The permanent collection started with nine pieces. Now? How about over 40,000!

Best of all...it's FREE for the 31-hour celebration. The party starts TOMORROW (Friday, 16-December) and runs until 5pm on Saturday, 17-December.

Here's a run-down of the events on tap:

Friday, December 16th:

5 pm to 8 pm: Art Making Activities
5 pm to 7 pm: Piano by Wayne Daigrepont
6 pm: Comedic Improv Tour by The New Movement
7pm to 8:30 pm: Isidore Newman Choir
7:30 pm 8 pm: Reading with Mark Yakich from Checking In/Checking Out
8 pm to 12 am: Art Making Activities by Prospect.2
8:30 pm: Tour by Modern and Contemporary Art Curator Miranda Lash
9 pm to 12 am: New Orleans Jazz Institute Quartet
9:30 pm: Irvin Mayfield performance and book signing
10 pm: Comedic Improv Tour by The New Movement

Saturday, December 17th:

Midnight to 3 am: Quintron – DJ Set
Midnight and 4 am film screening of Science of Sleep
2 am film screening of Basquiat
3 am to 6 am: DJ Kazu
8 am: Yoga in Second Floor Museum Galleries
9 am to 11 am: NOCCA Jazz Brunch in Café NOMA by Ralph Brennan
11 am to 4 pm: Art Making Activities (Young Audiences, YAYA, KIDsmART)
11 am: Roots of Music Second Line around NOMA leading to the front steps
11:15/11:30 am: Remarks by Susan Taylor on front steps
11:30 am to 2:30 pm: Educational Programming
2:30 pm to 4:30 pm: Amanda Shaw Finale Performance

All this, and the La Cocinita food truck will be out there, selling their delicious arepas and tacos starting at Midnight Friday night/Saturday morning.

The "Republicans Heart the Military" myth/meme

Because Republicans are stupid, they often get caught by the law of unintended consequences. The Solyndra "scandal" is a great example of this:

However, in gunning after the Department of Energy and its solar power loan program they have fallen prey to the law of unintended consequences, and are now heading on a collision course with the Department of Defense.

Why does the writer feel this is a problem? Because of the meme:

That is a rather odd position for the Republican Party to be in, given that it has built its brand on unequivocal support for the U.S. military, but for several years now DoD has been committed to transitioning out of petroleum fuels and into solar energy and other alternatives.

The meme is that Republicans <3 the military. Like most things Republican, it's a lie. Republicans love the people who give them campaign contributions. That is a very limited subset of the "the military." Veterans benefits? Forget it. Veterans aren't big-money Republican donors (although the American Legion and the VFW follow these people like stupid sheep). Alternative energy? Not only are the companies developing this technology off the donor-radar of the Republican Party, they're in direct conflict with one of the backbones of that party's financial base, Big Oil.

Don't be distracted by the meme, even when it dupes a liberal website. Republicans don't give two fucks about the military or national defense. They're war profiteers.

Landing in a Soyuz...

Older Americans who were around to see the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo space missions remember "splashdowns." Most everyone else knows the glider landings of the Shuttle Orbiter fleet. An American in command of a Soyuz spacecraft landing in the desert in Kazakhstan? Wow...

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - YatPundit's blog